Unexplained Anomalies: Avi Loeb is Examining the Possibility of Extraterrestrial Origins

Professor Brian Keating
6 min readJul 16, 2023

Where Did This Extraterrestrial Material Come From? Avi Loeb

Are We Alone in the Universe?: “And, of course, at that point, there is a second question. Could it be that it was an artificial object, that it was manufactured by a technological civilization? Just imagine droplets melting off semiconductors or an electric circuit, they would have a balance of rare elements that would be very different than the abundance you find in nature.”

— Avi Loeb

I sat down with esteemed professor Avi Loeb to discuss the fascinating topic of unidentified anomalous phenomena and the potential origins of extraterrestrial objects. Here are some of the highlights from their conversation:

Unveiling the Unexplainable

Avi Loeb expressed his fascination with the few unexplainable objects that defy conventional identification, believing that they may provide crucial evidence of extraterrestrial life. He shed light on the Galileo Project, which aims to investigate these anomalies, documenting them as outliers when data is insufficient, but potentially suggesting a non-human origin when enough information exists.

The Pursuit of Knowledge

Loeb emphasized the need to develop advanced capabilities and utilize instruments to uncover the true nature of these enigmatic objects. Referring to the Nimitz incident, he stressed the importance of corroborating evidence to discern whether multiple sightings involve the same object.

A Historic Discovery

Discussing the discovery of metal structures found on the path of a meteor, Loeb proposed using sonar to search for larger fragments on the ocean floor. By determining their composition, scientists could unveil whether they are rocks or potentially technological artifacts. However, Loeb cautioned for cautious examination and laboratory analysis before any engagement with a potential technological discovery.

Investigating Extraterrestrial Materials

Loeb delved into the complexities of identifying the interstellar origin of materials, pointing out the challenges of imitating material from another planetary system. He shared his excitement about the ongoing analysis of a meteorite composition by three neutral laboratories with expertise in studying meteorites, emphasizing the importance of open data and peer-reviewed scientific findings.

A Journey of Science

Throughout their expedition, Loeb documented his discoveries in diary reports that resonated with millions of people worldwide. Readers appreciated the glimpse into the scientific process, highlighting the importance of embracing uncertainty and the journey of exploring partial data.

The Mars Enigma

Loeb also delved into the mysteries of Mars, highlighting the potential for underground lava tubes to harbor traces of past life. He discussed the absence of visible high-rise structures on the planet, theorizing that frequent asteroid impacts may have destroyed them, and expressed hope for future NASA rover missions to uncover evidence of early life on Mars.

Evidence-Based Science

Loeb emphasized the necessity of evidence-based science over personal beliefs and opinions, encouraging patience and waiting for results rather than engaging in premature debates. He received support from the Department of Defense and other sources during his expedition, solidifying the scientific process and its commitment to objective analysis.

Stay Curious and Open-Minded

At The INTO THE IMPOSSIBLE Podcast, we encourage our listeners to embrace the wonders of the unknown and remain curious as we navigate the frontiers of science. Join us as we continue to explore the impossible and seek answers to the mysteries of the universe.

Thank you for being part of our podcast community!

Best regards,

Prof. Brian Keating

And the INTO THE IMPOSSIBLE Podcast Team

Questions and answers

Question 1: How do scientists determine if unidentified objects have an extraterrestrial origin?

Answer: Scientists rely on data analysis and the use of scientific instruments to determine the nature of unidentified objects. They report anomalies as outliers if there is insufficient data, but may make statements about their non-human origin if there is enough information.

Question 2: What evidence suggests that the metal structures found along the interstellar meteor path could be of artificial or technological origins?

Answer: The composition of the metal structures found along the interstellar meteor path suggests they may be of artificial or technological origins. The presence of spheres inside spheres indicates a complex formation process that would be challenging to replicate in a laboratory.

Question 3: What is the importance of determining the interstellar origin of the materials found on the meteor path?

Answer: Determining the interstellar origin of the materials found would be a historic discovery. It could provide valuable insights into the existence of extraterrestrial life and the composition of other planetary systems.

Question 4: What steps did the speaker take to ensure the integrity of the sample collected from the ocean floor?

Answer: The speaker closely monitored the scraping of magnets during the expedition to ensure the integrity of the sample and prevent contamination. They sent a memo to all team members emphasizing that nobody should touch the sample without permission.

Question 5: How does the speaker plan to analyze the composition of the meteorite sample?

Answer: The composition analysis of the meteorite sample will be conducted by three neutral laboratories with expertise in studying meteorites. This ensures an unbiased analysis and allows for verification of the findings.

Question 6: Why does the speaker emphasize the importance of evidence-based science over personal beliefs and social media opinions?

Answer: The speaker emphasizes evidence-based science over personal beliefs and social media opinions because the scientific process requires rigorous analysis and verification of data. Accepting claims without proper evidence can lead to false conclusions.

Question 7: What are the potential implications of finding evidence of life in the underground lava tubes on Mars?

Answer: If evidence of life is found in the underground lava tubes on Mars, it would suggest the possibility of intelligent life developing on the planet. This discovery would greatly contribute to our understanding of the potential for life beyond Earth.

Question 8: What was the reader’s response to the speaker’s diary reports from the expedition?

Answer: Readers appreciated the speaker’s diary reports because they showed the process of doing science, working with partial data, and constantly gathering more information. Some readers even mentioned that reading the reports gave them a new sense of why life is worth living.

Question 9: How did the speaker collect the materials from the ocean floor, and what did they find?

Answer: The speaker and their team used a magnetic sled to collect materials from the ocean floor. They found volcanic ash to be the most abundant material. Under microscopic examination, they identified about 50 spheroles (droplets) in the collected samples.

Question 10: How does the presence of spheroles confirm the accuracy of the government’s sensors regarding the explosion area?

Answer: Finding spheroles near the government-identified explosion area confirms the accuracy of the government’s sensors. This indicates that the government’s data regarding the explosion area is reliable and can be used for further analysis.


unidentified anomalous phenomena, balloons, drones, objects, extraterrestrial origin, Galileo project, observatory, anomalies, outliers, non-human origin, capabilities, instruments, Nimitz incident, multiple sightings, corroborating evidence, age of the solar system, spherals, composition, interstellar origin, historic discovery, artificial origins, technological origins, sonar, big piece, rock, technological gadget, caution, laboratory examination, government access, meteorites, natural, technologically made, access to a meteorite, composition analysis, neutral laboratories, expertise, open data, knowledge, speculation, instruments, results, Galileo project, measure what is measurable, memo, sample, permission, monitoring, integrity of the sample, contamination, imitate material, tampered with, temperature, complex formation process, laboratory replication, scientific paper, peer review, scientific findings, artist, sculpture, Alan Bergman, songwriter, composer, Pacific Ocean, government officials, evidence, skepticism, direct evidence, human testimony, scientific instruments, Department of Defense, support, pentagon, evidence-based science, personal beliefs, social media opinions, pushback, explanation, anomalous data, Mars, atmosphere, liquid water, NASA rovers, traces of early life, underground lava tubes, cosmic rays, extreme temperature variations, wall paintings, skeletons, intelligent life, visible high-rise structures, asteroid impacts, uncertain, diary reports, million people, Spanish, partial data, conjectures, honesty, scientific process, uncertainty, velocity, Tasteva, US space command, Spheroes, contrast, background lines, chance, interstellar object, isotope ratios, composition, solar system objects, interstellar composition, evidence, science, site, negative statements, kinetic energy, impactors, escape speed, error budget, revising the model, dark matter, exoplanet, Voyager, magnetic sled, ocean floor, volcanic ash, vacuum cleaner, mesh, microscope, samples, X-ray fluorescence.



Professor Brian Keating

Chancellor’s Distinguished Professor at UC San Diego. Host of The INTO THE IMPOSSIBLE Podcast Authored: Losing the Nobel Prize & Think like a Nobel Prize Winner