Anti-Science Alert: How Candace Owens Pollutes the Intellectual Landscape
Does Science Need a Reality Check?
In an era where information is more accessible than ever, a troubling rise in anti-scientific sentiment has emerged. Figures like Terrence Howard and Candace Owens use their platforms to spread ideas that would be laughable if they weren’t so dangerous. This “intellectual pollution” undermines the foundations of scientific progress and rational thought.
The Allure of Anti-Science
Last Monday, I joined a panel hosted by Piers Morgan, featuring Eric Weinstein and podcast host Tom Bilyeu. The topic was the curious case of Terrence Howard. On Joe Rogan’s podcast, the largest media platform in the world, Howard confidently declared that “1x1 equals 2,” among other bizarre claims. His appearance, which reached millions, exemplifies the viral nature of anti-scientific rhetoric. Howard’s ideas, lacking any basis in reality, were given undue legitimacy by the platform’s reach and influence.
Candace Owens, another prominent figure, takes anti-science to new heights with statements like NASA having “Satanic Origins” and referring to science as a “Pagan Cult.” These assertions are false and dangerously misleading, especially given her large and impressionable audience. Owens’ comments, in addition to her blatant antisemitism and Holocaust denial, contribute to a broader trend of questioning established scientific knowledge.
The Impact of Intellectual Pollution
The dissemination of such ideas is not without consequence. Scientific literacy is crucial for addressing global challenges, from climate change to pandemics. Yet figures like Howard and Owens erode public trust in scientific institutions and experts. This skepticism can lead to dangerous behaviors, such as refusing vaccinations, ultimately putting public health and safety at risk.
The Role of Peer Review and Scientific Communication
The peer review process, a cornerstone of scientific integrity, is attacked by those who abandon it in favor of sensationalism. Taking advice on peer review from individuals who repudiate it is likeseeking marriage advice from Andrew Tate. Despite its flaws, peer review is essential for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of scientific research.
However, the scientific community must also acknowledge its shortcomings. The traditional gatekeepers of scientific knowledge have sometimes failed to communicate effectively with the public. Figures like Elon Musk have succeeded in making science exciting again, but this should not come at the expense of rigorous, evidence-based discourse. Piers even pointed out that Twitter/X’s new “Community Notes” feature is a watchdog on egregious intellectual pollution. But Twitter isn’t real life, and many aren’t on it.
The Danger of Mainstream Science Stagnation
Some argue that mainstream science has stalled and that alternative theories should be considered more. While questioning established norms can lead to breakthroughs, it is equally important to differentiate between legitimate scientific inquiry and baseless conjecture. Platforms like arXiv and Vixra, which provide open access to scientific papers, demonstrate the potential for more inclusive scientific discourse without sacrificing quality.
The Rise of Anti-Scientism
The popularity of flat-earth theories, moon landing denial, and ancient civilization myths can be attributed to various factors. The post-COVID fallout, populist podcasts seeking clickbait, and the perceived arrogance of scientific atheists have all contributed to this phenomenon. In a world increasingly dominated by “your truth over my truth,” the objective reality of scientific evidence is often overshadowed.
The Path Forward: Cleaning the Landscape of Ideas
We must reinforce the importance of scientific literacy and critical thinking to combat intellectual pollution. This involves improving scientific communication to the public, addressing the shortcomings of peer review, and making science more engaging without resorting to cheap sensationalism. Figures with large public platforms like Eric Weinstein and Neil deGrasse Tyson have essential roles to play in this effort.
Ultimately, science should be driven by curiosity and evidence, not by the allure of sensationalism or the temptation of populist rhetoric. By reaffirming our commitment to scientific rigor, we can navigate the complexities of the modern world and build a future grounded in truth, free from pernicious intellectual pollution.
Until next time, have a M.A.G.I.C. week!
Brian
Appearance
“Trust the science” became the mantra during the pandemic — but now it seems we’re living in an age where the likes of Terrence Howard and Candace Owens are trying to debunk it.
Actor Howard recently raised eyebrows when he appeared on Joe Rogan’s podcast, claiming he can kill gravity and doesn’t believe in the number zero among other outlandish theories.
Piers Morgan speaks to mathematician and physicist Eric Weinstein — who was invited by Rogan to challenge Terrence’s theories — before the pair are joined by cosmologist Professor Brian Keating and YouTuber Tom Bilyeu.
Genius
This week, I refer you to a documentary about one of my favorite geniuses. The Fantastic Mr. Feynman.
People always ask me which Nobel Prize winner I’d most like to have the opportunity to host on The INTO THE IMPOSSIBLE Podcast, and my answer is ‘Richard Feynman.’ So when Tim Ferriss [in part, the inspiration for my second book, Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner] gave this documentary a shout-out recently, I had to check it out.
It’s full of his characteristic wit and wisdom, and my favorite thing is hearing his aphorisms in his voice!
Which Nobel Prize winner would you most like to have a coffee with?
Image
Just back from Hawaii and revisiting the stunning Volcano National Park pictures.
What’s your favorite national park?
Conversation
For centuries, we have observed the night sky and wondered about the laws of nature, matter, and our place in the universe. Once rooted in theology and philosophy, these questions are now being explored through the prism of high-energy particle physics with one goal in mind — to discover the final, definitive theory — the theory of everything. But what is a theory of everything? And does it even exist?
Here today, to explore these questions with me, is none other than Don Lincoln, a renowned experimental physicist and host of the Fermilab YouTube channel! Don has recently published Einstein’s Unfinished Dream, a book in which he explores the cutting-edge research of modern particle physicists that is slowly pushing us towards a theory of everything. Tune in!
Not sponsored, but please take a look at Auri.ai
I wanted to take a moment to share an app I’ve been using lately: Auri AI. It’s an all-in-one assistant that makes my life so much easier.
Auri AI has this incredible iOS keyboard that works seamlessly in any app. It’s multilingual and supports 83 languages. It lets me create text, paraphrase, translate, fix grammar, and type with my voice using Whisper. It’s been a game-changer for replying to emails on the go.
But that’s not all — Auri AI also has this cool voice notes feature. I can easily record and transcribe notes from my iPhone or Apple Watch and then convert them into polished writing. It’s perfect for creating brain dump notes, summarizing meetings, creating to-do lists, or even taking podcast notes.
The “Chat with Auri” feature is fast and supports images, voice typing, and 18 characters. Lastly, the text notes feature comes with all the tools you’d expect, like writing, rephrasing, translation, summarization, and voice typing. It’s a fantastic way to organize my thoughts and ideas.
If you’re looking for an app that can help streamline your workflow and boost your productivity, I highly recommend trying Auri AI. It’s been an absolute joy to use, and I think you’ll love it too.
Use this special link: https://auri.ai/brian to check it out.
